|

Polybius

Hannibal
|
The
Histories, Book IX, Chapters 22-26:
Of
all that befell the Romans and Carthaginians, good or bad, the cause was one man
and one mind---
Hannibal
. For it is notorious that he managed the Italian campaigns in person, and the
Spanish by the agency of the elder of his brothers, Hasdrubal, and subsequently
by that of Mago, the leaders who killed the two Roman generals in Spain about
the same time. Again, he conducted the Sicilian campaign first through
Hippocrates and afterwards through Myttonus the Libyan. So also in Greece and
Illyria: and, by brandishing before their faces the dangers arising from these
latter places, he was enabled to distract the attention of the Romans thanks to
his understanding with King Philip [Philip V, King of Macedon]. So great and
wonderful is the influence of a Man, and a mind duly fitted by original
constitution for any undertaking within the reach of human powers.
But
since the position of affairs has brought us to inquiry into the genius of
Hannibal
, the occasion seems to me to demand that I should explain in regard to him the
peculiarities of his character which have been especially the subject of
controversy. Some regard him as having been extraordinarily cruel, some
exceedingly grasping of money. But to speak the truth of him, or of any person
engaged in public affairs, is not easy. Some maintain that men's natures are
brought out by their circumstances, and that they are detected when in office,
or as some say when in misfortunes, though they have up to that time completely
maintained their secrecy.
I, on the contrary, do not regard this as a sound dictum. For I think that men
in these circumstances are compelled, not occasionally but frequently, either by
the suggestions of friends or the complexity of affairs, to speak and act
contrary to real principles. And there are many proofs of this to be found in
past history if any one will give the necessary attention. Is it not universally
stated by the historians that Agathocles, tyrant of
Sicily
, after having the reputation of extreme cruelty in his original measures for
the establishment of his dynasty, when he had once become convinced that his
power over the Siceliots was firmly established, is considered to have become
the most humane and mild of rulers? Again, was not Cleomenes of Sparta a most
excellent king, a most cruel tyrant, and then again as a private individual most
obliging and benevolent? And yet it is not reasonable to suppose the most
opposite dispositions to exist in the same nature. They are compelled to change
with the changes of circumstances: and so some rulers often display to the world
a disposition as opposite as possible to their true nature.
Therefore,
the natures of men not only are not brought out by such things, but on the
contrary are rather obscured. The same effect is produced also not only in
commanders, despots, and kings, but in states also, by the suggestions of
friends. For instance, you will find the Athenians responsible for very few
tyrannical acts, and of many kindly and noble ones, while Aristeides and
Pericles were at the head of the state: but quite the reverse when Cleon and
Chares were so.
And when the Lacedaemonians were supreme in
Greece
, all the measures taken by King Cleombrotus were conceived in the interests of
their allies, but those by Agesilaus not so. The characters of states therefore
vary with the variations of their leaders. King Philip again, when Taurion and
Demetrius were acting with him, was most impious in his conduct, but when Aratus
or Chrysogonus, most humane.
The
case of
Hannibal
seems to me to be on a par with these. His circumstances were so extraordinary
and shifting, his closest friends so widely different, that it is exceedingly
difficult to estimate his character from his proceedings in
Italy
. What those circumstances suggested to him may easily be understood from what I
have already said, and what is immediately to follow; but it is not right to
omit the suggestions made by his friends either, especially as this matter may
be rendered sufficiently clear by one instance of the advice offered him. At the
time that Hannibal was meditating the march from Iberia to Italy with his army,
he was confronted with the extreme difficulty of providing food and securing
provisions, both because the journey was thought to be of insuperable length,
and because the barbarians that lived in the intervening country were numerous
and savage. It appears that at that time the difficulty frequently came on for
discussion at the council; and that one of his friends, called Hannibal
Monomachus, gave it as his opinion that there was one and only one way by which
it was possible to get as far as
Italy
.
Upon
Hannibal
bidding him speak out, he said that they must teach the army to eat human
flesh, and make them accustomed to it.
Hannibal
could say nothing against the boldness and effectiveness of the idea, but was
unable to persuade himself or his friends to entertain it.
It is this man's acts in
Italy
that they say were attributed to
Hannibal
, to maintain the accusation of cruelty, as well as such as were the result of
circumstances.
|
|
"Hey
Roman! What's Cookin'?"
From
the Archives of the Sodalitas Coqueror et Coquus
As presented by Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
The
Society of Cooks and Brewers
The
Sodalis pro Coqueror et Coquus is be devoted to the research into and
preparation and enjoyment of, the beverages, foods and dining methods of Roma
Antiqua, those of cultures with which she came into contact, those of Nova Roma
and the host cultures of Nova Roma's Cives. The main emphasis of all efforts
will be Roma Antiqua, with an eye to the future of Nova Roma. The Sodalis shall
provide a forum for improved communication and exchange of information between
the brewers and cooks of Nova Roma, and to the benefit of the general
population.
Regi Dean's Recipes
Baked
Red Mullet in a Fennel and Mint Sauce
Ingredients:
|
3 to 4lb Red Mullet |
|
Sauce (all herbs must
be fresh): |
|
Sprig of fresh rosemary |
Sprig of lovage |
|
1 teaspoon fresh mint |
2 teaspoons honey |
|
1/2 teaspoon coriander |
1 cup of fish stock |
|
Sprig of fennel top or
dill |
drizzle of olive oil |
|
Ground black pepper |
3 tablespoons white wine |
Place the mullet
in a paper "cartoccio" with olive oil, salt, pepper, white wine and a
sprig of rosemary. Close the parcel and bake for 30 to 40 minutes or until
cooked. In a mortar grind together the herbs (or finely chop) and combine with
the other ingredients. Simmer for 25 minutes to reduce. Pour over baked mullet
and serve.
From
"The Roman Cookery of Apicius" by John Ewards and has been adapted
according to my own experiments.
Regi
Dean's Recipes
Casserole
Apicius with meat or fish
Serving Size: 4
Ingredients:
|
Amount
or Measure |
Ingredient
/ preparation method |
|
For
pancakes: |
|
3 |
Eggs
|
|
1/2 cup |
Flour
|
|
1/3 cup |
Milk
|
|
1/3 cup |
Water
|
|
For
casserole: |
|
1-1/2 cups |
Cooked pork or chicken,
thinly sliced |
|
|
—or— |
|
1-1/2 lbs |
Cooked fish fillets |
|
3 |
Raw eggs |
|
2 tbs |
Olive oil |
|
1/2 t |
Ground pepper |
|
1/2 t |
Celery seed (or lovage) |
|
2 cups |
Beef or chicken stock |
|
1/2 cup |
White wine |
|
1/4 cup |
Sweet raisin wine (muscatel) |
|
|
Flour |
|
|
Coarsely ground pepper |
|
|
Pine nuts or almonds |
First make the
pancakes: beat 3 eggs and add flour, milk and water to make a thin batter. Into
a greased 8 inch frying pan, pour a little of the batter and allow it to spread
evenly. Cook each pancake over high heat and flip over when it is lightly
browned.
Prepare the coked meat or fish:- Mix with eggs, olicþ oil, celery seed, stock,
white wine and sweet wine. Heat the meats in this sauce, adding more liquid if
require. Thicken the sauce with flour.
Next, take a greased casserole dish and cover the bottom with a layer of meats
or fish in their sauce. Sprinkle with coarsely ground pepper and with nuts. On
this, place a pancake. Fill the dish with layers of the sauced meats, seasoned
with pepper and nuts, each alternating with a pancake.
Pierce a hole in the final pancake to allow steam to escape and cook uncovered
in a 375 F oven for 20- 25 minutes until the dish is uniformly heated. Serve
with a sprinkling of pepper.
Source - The Roman Cookery of Apicius.
Regi Dean's Recipes:
Cheese Pie (Crostata Di Ricotta)
Serving Size: 1
Ingredients:
|
Amount or Measure |
Ingredient
/ preparation method |
|
Pastry
Crust-Pasta Frolla |
|
2 cups |
Unsifted all purpose flour |
|
12 tbs |
Lard
or butter at room temperature but not soft |
|
4 |
Egg yolks |
|
1/4 cup |
Sugar
|
|
3 tbs |
Dry
Marsala
wine
|
|
1 t |
Freshly grated lemon peel
|
|
1/2 t |
Salt |
|
Ricotta
Filling |
|
5 cups |
Ricotta cheese |
|
1/2
cup |
Sugar |
|
1
tbs |
Flour
|
|
1/2
tbs |
Salt
|
|
1 t |
Vanilla
extract |
|
1 t |
Freshly grated orange peel |
|
4 |
Egg yolks |
|
1 tbs |
White raisins, rinsed and
drained |
|
1 tbs |
Diced candied citron |
|
2 tbs |
Slivered blanched almonds or
pine nuts |
|
1 |
Egg white mixed with 1
tablespoon water |
Instructions:
Pastry Crust
In a large mixing bowl, make a well in the center of two cups of flour .Drop
into it the butter {or lard}, egg yolks, sugar,
Marsala
, lemon peel and salt. With your fingertips mix the ingredients together,
incorporating as much flour as you can. With the heels of your hands, work in
the rest of the flour until the dough is smooth and can be gathered into a ball.
Do not, however, knead the dough or work it any more than necessary. {If you
have an electric mixer with a paddle attachment, all of the ingredients can
be placed in the bowl at once and mixed at low speed until they are just
combined.} The dough can be rolled out at once, but if it seems at all oily,
refrigerate it for about 1 hour, or until it is firm but not hard.
Pre-heat the oven
to 350^. Break off about 1/4 of the dough, dust lightly with flour
and cover with wax paper or plastic wrap; set aside in the
refrigerator. Reshape the rest of the dough into a ball and place on a
lightly floured board or pastry cloth. With the heel of your hand, flatten
the ball into a disc about 1 inch thick. Dust a little flour over both
sides of the disc to prevent the dough from sticking, and begin
rolling it out---starting from the center and rolling to within an
inch of the far edge. Gently lift the dough, turn clockwise, and roll out again
from the center to the far edge. Repeat lifting, turning and rolling until the
disc is about 1/8 inch thick and at least 11 inches across. If the dough sticks
to the board or cloth while you are rolling it out, lift it gently with a wide
metal spatula and sprinkle a little flour under it.
Lightly butter the bottom and sides of a 9-by-11/2-inch spring-form or
false-bottom cake pan. Then, starting at the nearest edge of the circle, lift
the pastry and drape it over the rolling pin. Place the pin in the middle of the
buttered pan, and unfold the pastry over it, leaving some slack in the center.
Gently press the pastry into the bottom and around the sides of the pan, taking
care not to stretch it. Roll the pin over the edge of the pan, pressing down
hard to trim off the excess pastry around the top.
Unwrap the
remaining pastry, place it on a lightly floured board or cloth, flatten it with
the heel of your hand and roll it into a rectangle about 12 inches long. With a
pastry wheel or sharp knife, cut the rectangle into long, even strips about 12
inch wide.
Instructions:
Ricotta Filling
Combine the ricotta cheese with 1/2 cup of sugar, 1 tablespoon flour, 1/2
teaspoon salt, the vanilla, grated orange peel and egg yolks, and beat until
they are thoroughly mixed. Stir in the raisins and the candied orange
peel and citron. Spoon this filling into the partially baked pastry shell,
spreading it evenly with a rubber spatula. Sprinkle the top with slivered
almonds or pine nuts, then weave or crisscross the pastry strips across the pie
to make a lattice design. Brush the strips lightly with the egg-white -and-water
mixture. Bake on the middle shelf of the oven for 1 to 1- 1/4 hours, or until
the crust is golden and the filling is firm.
Remove the pie from the oven and slide off the outside the outside rim of the
pan. Cool the pie on a wire rack, leaving the bottom disc in place. If you would
prefer to remove the disc before serving the pie, wait until the pie is cool,
loosen the bottom crust with a wide metal spatula, and carefully slide the pie
off the disc onto a round serving plate.
Fresh fruits like white grapes, served with crostata di ricotta, make a tangy,
sweet contrast to the richness of the pie. Crostata di ricotta is one of the
oldest Roman dishes.
From the files of Al Rice, North Pole,
Alaska
, Feb. 1994
.
-TOP-
----------
Three Eastern
Cities:
Antioch
Marcus
Minucius - Tiberius Audens
In
looking at the city of
Antioch
we will investigate the capitol city f
the Roman Provincia of
Syria
.
Antioch
derived most of its wealth from
agricultural products which were the fruits of the plain on which t was located.
The principal produce of this area was olive oil and wine. The city was
located on the River Orontes, and was widely celebrated for the wealth that was
found here as well as the luxury of those who could afford it.
Antioch
was connected to the sea by 15 miles
of good
Roman Road
. At the nd of that road was the
seaport city of
Seleucia
which served
Antioch
s a outlet for local products and as a
inlet for the trade products brought to the city by the extensive Roman merchant
sea lanes.
Antioch
lies in the shadow of
Mt.
Silpius
(approx. 600 meters in height) just to
the West of the city about 1500 meters. The city's Circus, Palace and
Tetrapylon are located behind fortified walls on an island in the middle of the
Orontes
River
. There are four bridges which
allow access to this part of the city. It's fortifications and wall are
separate from the Southern portion of
Antioch
. The western side of
Antioch
along the River side is protected by
the Wall of Seleucus II. In this wall is a water gate and bridge leading to the
western side of the river. There the road divides and one road goes West
to
Tarsus
and Selecia, the other road goes South
to Laodicia and then on to
Jerusalem
. Between the city and
Mt.
Silpius
is the road down the Eastern bank of
the
Orontes
to Daphne. It is named the Street of
Herod and Tiberius. The southern end of this street goes past the Cherubin
Gate, and then South through the Daphne Gate. This street then extends
northward past the Theatre of Caesar, through the small town of
Nymphasium
and then northward again through the
Eastern Gate and on to Buroea and Cyrrhus.
An
aqueduct begins about 500 meters due East of the Eastern Gate and parallels
roughly the street and road South to Daphne. The aqueduct crosses two
streams, the Parmenius, which flows to the river just North of Nymphasium and
the Phyrminus which flows to the
Orontes
just South of the Daphne Gate.
These two streams drain two shallow valleys at the foot of
Mt.
Silpius
. The Amphitheatre of Antioch is
located between the Street of Herod and Tiberius just North of the Cherubin
Gate. At the Daphne Gate the city wall extends eastward to approximately
the 100 meter elevation mark and here there is located a reservoir.
On
the western side of the river opposite and just South of the Seleucid agora in
the lower town is the Campus Martius. The lower part of the city nearby
the Daphne Gate was the well known area of elegance and wealth which was denoted
by the large villas, gardens and the lovely vistas found there.
The
heavy walls which protected the city were mute testimony of the threat of the
Persian Empire
after the 3rd Century A.D.
However, even with that threat hanging over the city it still remained a center
of both trade as well as administration in the Roman East.
-TOP-
----------
Institutions
& Magistracies of Roman North
Africa
Dominus
Praefectus Serapio
The
People & Senate
The hallmark of Augustan policy in proconsular
Africa
was the superimposition of the new provincial administrative organization on to
the preexisting civic structures, which were not dismantled. there is no doubt
that in the cities of
Tripolitania
these structures (magistracy, law and religion) remained more intact for a
longer period than anywhere else. To be more specific, this was truer of
Sabratha (and perhaps also of Oea) than of Lepcis, which among the religion's
cities was the most open to contact with the outside world and far away the
least "provincial".
In
fact, it was not long before Lepcis officially turned its long-standing
friendship and alliance with
Rome
into grateful and devoted submission. A lot of public inscriptions dating back
from the decades marking the transition to the Christian age were discovered
when the city was excavated. these have shed light on the gradual incorporation
of what was once an independent political and cultural world into the
Roman empire
.
The
archaeological evidence leaves no doubt that the political and administrative
structures in place in the
Emporia
were directly derived from those that had been in use in
Carthage
. However, on the other hand, as "civitates liberae" (free citizens)
until at least the 1st century A.D., the people of the
Emporia
continued to use the Punic language alongside Latin in their official
inscriptions.
Despite
the opinion of Sallust to the contrary, this was almost identical to the
language of
Carthage
;
Tripolitania
managed to maintain its original linguistic dignity fro an exceptionally long
period of time, without ever degenerating into dialect. On the basis of
Aristotle's analysis in his "Politics" (book II), the civic
institutions of the cities also seem to have been very like those found in
contemporary
Carthage
. There were two legislative assemblies made up respectively of representatives
of the aristocracy and representatives of the people. Once a year they elected
the highest magistrates within their community, the "suffecti".
The
Suffecti
The highest magistracy in Carthaginian cities, and therefore also in the
cities of
Tripolitania
, was made up of "suffecti", who formed a civil college of
magistrates, almost always with two members. It therefore follows that one
feature that generally differentiates the money coined in the cities of the
Emporia
are the names (sometimes just the initials) of the "suffecti" in
office that year. In addition, coins showed the name of the city minting the
money and bore a tag equivalent to the Latin "moneta senatus" (coin of
the Senate).
With
the sole (and then only temporary) exception of Lepcis, when the cities of
Tripolitania
became municipalities or colonies under the Empire, the suffecti were replaced
by "duumvirs", though their role remained pretty much the same as that
of the suffecti.
The
Mahazim
Another layer of magistrates were elected annually
to serve alongside the suffecti, but were lower in rank: these were the "mahazim",
whose title was latinizen as Aediles. They were two magistrates whose job was to
look after the markets, to impose fines or taxes that they themselves set, and
other matters of a monetary nature; it is possible that they also oversaw public
works. Their tasks were similar to those of the roman Aediles, a title they kept
after the Tripolitanian Emporia acquired the status of municipality or colony.
Honorary
Titles
Finally, there is no doubt that honorary titles such as ornator patriae, amator
patriae, amator civium, amator concordiae, etc., which were widely used in
Lepcis until the 1st century, were translations from the Punic language. We also
find them in Sabratha and again in Lepcis in later centuries.
It
has recently been suggested that these did not come from a genuine Carthaginian
tradition but were rather borrowed from Greco-Hellenistic world. This is quite
possible and fits into the pattern of relations between the independent
Tripolitania
of the 2nd and 1st centuries B.C. and
Alexandria
and other Greek cities of the central and eastern
Mediterranean
. These titles, it seems, were so congenial to the Punic peoples of
Tripolitania
that they slipped into their culture and remained there.
The
New Legal Status & the Cursus Honorum for the Cities of the Empire
It was between 74 A.D. and 77-78 A.D. that in Lepcis, became a Latin
municipality, we find the first mention of a "patronus municipii"
(city guardian). Lepcis, in fact, wasn't governed by duumvirs; it had kept its
suffecti. Although its "promotion" in status was indeed a sign of the
municipal desire that soon gripped the political classes of the richest
proconsular cities, it also fitted neatly into the huge program of romanization
that the Flavians were pushing through
Africa
.
Perhaps,
neither Sabratha nor Oea were included in this program. Although both towns
developed significantly, neither of them matched Lepcis. This is borne out, at
least in the case of Sabratha, by excavation work. In reality, in Sabratha there
are only two names connected with a Curia that can be used to establish a date
when it passed from a peregrine city (a foreign city not governed by Roman law)
to a municipality or colony: those of Adrianus and Faustinus. So maybe the city
(like the nearby Gightis) may have become a municipality under Antoninus Pius.
Compare
this to Oea, where a grandiose four-way arch was erected during Marcus Aurelius'
reign. It seems probably that the arch may have been intended to celebrate the
city's promotion to municipality, and indeed it is likely thet it may even been
Marcus Aurelius who granted it colonial status. Soon after Oea, a temple
dedicated to the genius of the colony appears to have been completed between 183
A.D. and 185 A.D. Given the importance of the all-marble building, however, it
is highly probable that its construction had been decided upon some years
earlier. Lepcis, the jewel of the
Emporia
, had, on the other hand, already been awarded the honor of colonial status
some time before 110 A.D. This was when the four-way (quadrifrons) arch was
inaugurated at the main city entrance: the arch was dedicated to Imperator
Traianus and was clearly intended to thank him for his generosity. It was
without doubts also erected to acknowledge both the great economic importance
that the city had attained, and also its ancient origins.
Recognition
of the city later culminated in it being granted "ius italicum". This
meant, among other things, that Septimius Severus (born in Lepcis), exempted the
land in the territory from paying taxes. And it may have been when this
concession was granted (and certainly not later than 202 A.D.) that the
Lepticians declared their gratitude and loyalty to Septimius Severus and his son
Caracalla by commissioning statues to them to thank them for their "lofty
and divine benevolence"(as a local inscription says).
By
way of example of a typical cursus honorum, we can look at the career of Gaius
Anicius Frontus, a magistrate from Sabratha during the colonial period. An
inscription records his life and reveals his personal status as "equo
publico ornatus" (a member of the equestrian order). He was first a
Quaestor, then an Aedile, after which he moved on to the duumvirate and was
finally appointed Duumvir for a five-year period, in other words the most senior
magistrate in town. Furthermore he was rewarded with the title of "Amator
Patriae" (lover of his country). However, his cursus honorum didn't include
priestly roles. These had been of great importance both in the old Carthaginian
society and in that rather mixed society that was evolving in
Africa
, especially in its cities, during the
Roman empire
.
-TOP-
----------
Legionaries’ Long
Journey
Marek Grajek
Inscriptions
(or rather ancient grafitti) on the Egyptian monuments or the famous Greek
temples teach us a lesson about the early tourism under the Pax Romana. The
range of those journeys was usually limited to the imperial provinces. Only two
groups of men enjoyed the privilege of learning the world beyond the Empire
limits: merchants and soldiers. I am going to tell you a fascinating story of
the group of legionaries who, even if somewhat unwillingly, established the
direct contact between the two superpowers of the ancient world: Roman and
Chinese empires.
The
story starts at the plains of Carrhae, where Marcus Licinus Crassus led his
legions trying to force the escaping Parts into the regular battle. There was no
real need for this campaign. It resulted merely from the series of the strategic
errors and individual ambitions. After the decisive victory over
Antioch
at Magnesium (189 B.C.) the Romans humiliated in Apamea the descendants of
Seleucos one of the bravest generals of Alexander the Great. The part of the
kingdom reaching up to the
Taurus mountains
passed over to
Rome
’s allies Pergamon and Rhodos. Fifteen thousand talents paid up as the war
contribution. Fleet burned in the dockyards. The pride of the Seleucid army
the elephants partially in Pergamons hand, partially useless with their
tendons cut.
Antioch
the Great was killed soon after Apamea like an ordinary thief during a night
raid on one of the temples, in a desperate attempt to collect the contribution.
After his death the Seleucid kingdom was falling gradually into disarray, the
victim to the nomadic tribes emerging from the vast steppes of
Eurasia
. The Parns, known later as the Parts were one of them, successful enough to
found the state comparable in its size and power with the ancient
Persian empire
, on whose ruins it emerged. But in the first century B.C. the Parts have
not consolidated their power yet to the extent permitting to look with the
greedy eye on the rich towns in
Syria
. After all Euphratus seemed to be a natural border between the Partian
realms and
Rome
. Crassus had to consider the arguments of the different nature. The fame of his
colleagues in the triumvirate, Caesar and Pompeius, was growing fast, while
quiet
Syria
did not offer an opportunity for the military glory comparable to the victories
over the tribes of
Gallia
or
Germania
. Victorious campaign against Parts on the other bank of Euphratus might restore
the balance of power between the triumviri. So, ignoring numerous ominous signs
he led his 7 legions to
Mesopotamia
in 53 B.C. The legionaries carrying their usual heavy gear, suffering in their
armors from the heat and the lack of water cursed both their commander and the
enemy avoiding the open fight. Finally in the plains near Carrhae Roman arm
counting some 35 000 men encountered rather experimental Parthian corps: 10 000
man strong army consisting entirely of the mounted archers and heavily armored
cavalry (prototype to the later famous Byzantine cataphracta), no infantry. The
Parts flooded the Roman ranks with their arrows, supplied continually by the
special corps of 1000 camels. Parthian archers learned soon how to disrupt the
invincible Roman testudo they aimed their arrows at legionaries’ legs and
corpses. The attack of the scarce Roman mounted men commanded by Crassus’ son
was annihilated by the Parthian heavy cavalry. Florus reports that in the middle
of the battle, when tired to death legionaries were fighting for survival rather
than for the victory, they were blinded by the sun reflected in the banners of
silk unfolded suddenly by the Parts. In the resulting panic and escape some 20
000 Romans among them Crassus himself and his son - were killed and 10 000
captured. According to Florus in this rather unpleasant way the Romans learned
for the first time the silk, which will play an important role in our story.
Almost as important as a group of 150 legionaries captured at Carrhae by Parts.
Now
let us switch to the other end of
Eurasia
, where the Han dynasty has just emerged from the turmoil resulting from the
collapse of short-lived Q’in, the first dynasty that managed to unite all
the lands we know as
China
today. The Great Wall protecting Chinese kingdoms from the barbarians in the
north, constructed in pieces over centuries has been just integrated by the
mighty and cruel Q’in Shi Huang Di. The Hans discovered however soon that it
did not offer the protection from Xiongnu, the predecessors of what we know
today as Huns. Campaigns against Xiongnu fill a big part of records of the Early
Han period (approximately last 2 centuries B.C.). Fortunately for the Chinese
the Romans did not patent their old principle divide et impera, so that when the
Hans were able to celebrate the final victory it was due to breaking the
nomads’ unity rather than some military action. But before the Han emperors
could sigh with deep relief the very existence of Xiongnu gave birth to the
fabulous adventures by Zhang Qian and Ban Chao, opening the famous
Silk Road
.
In
year 138 B.C emperor Wu Di decided to use in the fight against Xiongnu their old
enemies, Yue Zhi, defeated in the past but not conquered. The risky mission to
Yue Zhi was entrusted to Zhang Qian, commanding the imperial palace guard. He
started his journey with 100 volunteers, to be captured by Xiongnu once he left
the territories under the Han control. Pretending to accept the failure of his
mission he married local woman, who gave him son. Ten years of the stable family
life gave him some freedom, which he used only to persuade some of his
companions to escape and continue their mission. When they finally reached Yue
Zhi they discovered that their hosts are not interested in returning to the old
disputes with the Xiongnu. Instead, they have turned their attention to the
north-west
India
, where 150 years later they established a new state known as the Kushan empire.
On his return route to China Zhang Qian was captured by Xiongnu again, managed
to escape and reach Chinese capital Chang-an after 13 years long journey, in the
company of his wife and a single servant. Although he was not bringing the
expected treaty with Yue Zhi, the emperor appreciated his mission’s results,
offering Zhang Qian nobility and numerous material rewards. According to one of
the most important Zhang Qian’s observations from his journey the horses he
saw in
Kokand
(present
Fergana
valley) surpassed by far anything the Chinese knew at that time. To fight the
nomadic Xiongnu emperor Wu Di was organizing the Chinese cavalry - equipping his
men with strong
Kokand
horses could neutralize the Xiongnu superiority in this field. More envoys were
sent to
Kokand
, however its rulers were more afraid of the neighboring Xiongnu than the
distant Chinese and declined to trade in their horses. Unfortunately for the
Kokand
rulers the Chinese army lost between 100 and 200 thousand horses only during 2
years long campaign against Xiongnu and Wu Di was serious about restoring his
cavalry. When he decided to dispatch 60 000 men strong army to
Kokand
, Zhang Qian was a natural candidate for its commander. After the deadly march
through the desert he managed to bring a half of his initial force to
Kokand
, where he started the siege of its capital - Ershi. When the Chinese diverted
the river supplying the town with water and, after 40 days of siege, seized the
external walls, they learned that the strong army of
Kokand
’s allies Kang-jiu is approaching Ershi, bringing with them the
specialists in well digging from DaJin. This offered sufficient ground for the
compromise. The rulers of
Kokand
decided to accept the Chinese authority, while the Chinese withdrew t he 10
thousand survivors of their initial army, escorting the
Kokand
horses to Chang-an. We have just, almost unconsciously, registered the first
record of the direct contact between
China
and the
Roman empire
: the specialists in well digging mentioned by the chronicle were representing
the Roman world and DaJin was the name describing for the long time the
Roman empire
in the Chinese records.
Zhang
Qian was leading more armies to the West, enjoying victories, suffering defeats,
sentenced to death by his own emperor, pardoned, finally died in Chang-an in
103/104 B.C. But thanks to his courage and persistence the Chinese kept on
controlling Tarim basin and the routes leading to the west until the new dynamic
superpower the Arabs - defeated their armies on the banks of Talas river,
giving birth to the Islamic Mawarannahr. But before that happened, merchants
from
China
,
Parthia
, Kushan empire and numerous small states on the
Silk Road
were crossing the deserts and mountains bringing to
Rome
the highly desired silk fabric. In general silk played an ugly role in the
Roman history. As we already know it started with the Crassus’ defeat at
Carrhae. Later on the passion of the Roman women and (even worse...) men for the
silk suits caused something that modern economists would call the distorted
trade balance. The East was not finding in the
Roman empire
goods attractive enough to accept them in exchange for the exported silk and
spices. The Romans kept on paying in gold and silver until (contemporary term
again) the empire had finally lost its financial liquidity.
Well,
it is time to get back to the Crassus’ legionaries captured by the Parts at
Carrhae. In the year 36 B.C. two Chinese generals, Zhen Tang and Gan Yenzhou,
besieged a town in the
Central Asia
. When it fell they have found among their prisoners a group of 145 strange
looking soldiers, who surprised them presenting a military rank described in the
Early Han chronicle as ‘fish scales rank’ and the art. of rapid camp
fortification with the wooden stockade. Some of them were also skilled in the
unknown in
China
art. of glass production. Sounds familiar?
To
fill in the gaps between two puzzle pieces we need some speculation. On the
other hand, the known facts do not permit too much freedom for the loose
interpretation. The legionaries captured at Carrhae must have been transferred
by the Parts as the complete unit to the eastern limits of their state, where
they formed a part of the military garrison protecting it from the Huns.
Captured again in one of the battles between the Parts and Huns, transferred
this time to the
Central Asia
they met the victorious Chinese. This was the end of their extraordinary
journey. The Chinese decided to settle their prisoners in one of the military
settlements guarding the
Silk Road
. The chronicles mention the post named Li Qian, situated in the Chinese
Turkistan until V century A.D. Li Qian is used in the Chinese records (next to
Da Jin) also to describe the distant
Rome
.
During
the imperial age Roman merchants were reaching on the more or less regular basis
the coasts of
India
. The chronicle of the Late Han dynasty mentions also the visit (166 A.D.) at
the imperial court of the envoys from the Roman ruler described as An Tun (Antoninus).
From the other side when the famous general Ban Zhao stationed his troops
near the coasts of the Caspian Sea (in 97 A.D.), he decided to dispatch an envoy
to the ruler of Da Jin (Rome). The envoy Gan Ying reached probably the
coasts of Syria, where he got intimidated by local merchants (naturally
interested in keeping their trade monopoly) that further travel to Rome by sea
might last for up to 2 years and gave up his mission. All those contacts between
the two superpowers of the ancient world do not obscure the earlier, more
difficult and spectacular adventure of the legionaries from Carrhae, who formed
the unit of the Roman army whose mission did not find a match neither in time
nor in the distance covered.
Postscriptum
Homer Hasenplug Dubs, an Oxford University professor of Chinese history, was the
first historian to link together the Latin records of the battle of Carrhae and
the Chinese sources (Qien Han Shi, The History of Early Han Dynasty), reporting
the presence of the (Roman?) mercenaries in the Hun troops defeated by the
Chinese army in 36 B.C. (Homer Dubs, A Roman city in ancient China?, London
1957).
While
no other written or archaeological sources confirm or deny this interesting
hypothesis, some enthusiastic Chinese were able to identify the village Lou
Zhuangzi in
Gansu
province as the ancient Li Qian, where the ex-legionaries were stationed after
going into the service of
China
. Hoping to boost tourism local authorities constructed Doric-style pavilion in
Lou Zhuangzi, while the county capital, Yongchang, boasts the huge statues of
Roman legionary and a Roman woman flanking the town’s main street and – to
keep proportions – the statue of some communist hero.
______________
Should
any member of Sodalitas Militarium be interested in a real in-depth research, I
am ready to share full list of Roman and Chinese sources.
-TOP-
----------
Latin
for the Illiterati
by G. Lanius Falco
Aurea
mediocritas
(”moderation
in all things”)
Gratia gratiam parit
(“kindness
produces kindness”)
Hostis
honori invidia
(“envy
is the foe of honor”)
Cassis
tutissima virtus
(“an
honest person need not fear a thing”)
Dictis
facta suppetant
(“let
deeds suffice for words”)
-TOP-
----------
|