"A Nova Roman Beacon for Recreation of the Best From Ancient Rome"

February Quarterly

The Rise of Philosophy in the West:
The Milesian School
Life After Death
Transportation in the Roman World
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus
Rhine River Patrol
Links to: Previous Quarterlies:
Pilum January 2005
Nova Britannia April 2005
August 2005
November 2005

 

The Rise of Philosophy in the West--The Milesian School
Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens

From what is known of ancient history, the rise of Philosophy begins in Greece with a man by the name of Thales.  This man is best known by his ability to predict a solar eclipse in the year 585 BC.  Since the information that Solar eclipses were known to occur in nineteen year cycles was in the hands of Babylonian astronomers this feat was not of any particular scientific feat except that the place in which the eclipse could be seen occurred in one place and not another.  It is to his credit certainly, that his prediction for Miletus was accurate. Thales was an educated man for this period, and is known to have traveled widely in Egypt, and to have picked up there the elements of "rule of thumb" geometry, and brought this science home to the Greeks.  Thales  was a native of the city of Miletus in Asia Minor.  He was known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece, each known for one wise saying.  Thale's saying supposedly was , "water is best."  The Milesian School, as it is known, was begun by Thales who believed that all things in the world evolved from water.  He believed that the world floated on water.  According to Aristotle, Thales believed that the magnet had a soul within it because it moves the iron, and all other things had gods within them.*

While Thales is too little known to say much about his involvement with philosophy past what has already been stated, the teachings of the Milesian School which followed him is much better known.  The following philosopher, by name of Anaxiander presents a more interesting and better known aspect.  He too believed that all things derived from a common, single and primal substance, but he disagreed with Thales in that he believed the substance to be infinite and ageless, unknown but "encompassing all the worlds."  According to Anaximander this substance is that from which all other substances are formed with which man is familiar.  He remarks about this in very determinate way,

"Into that from which things take their rise, they pass away once more, as is ordained, for they make reparation and satisfaction to one another for their injustice according to the ordering of time."

This thought promulgated by the philosopher says in essence that there should be in the known world a proportion of each of the basic elements (air, fire, earth and water -- each thought of as a god) and as a god each of these elements sought to increase it's own empire at the cost to the other elements.  However, there exists a law which is constantly at work to work at maintaining the balance in the world -- example:- where there has been fire, now there are ashes which is earth.

This idea or concept of the aspect of justice was very strong in in the Greek belief systems.  Not only that but the term "justice" does not do full account to the idea that the Greeks believed in.  "Justice" in the English language comes the closest to the meaning but does not include many aspects of what the Greeks held to. 

Further Anaximander believed as reported by Aristotle that the basic elements of air, fire, water, and earth, are in opposition to one another.  Air is cold, Water is moist, and Fire is hot.  The substance determined by him to be of primal basis had to be a neutral entity in the cosmic determination of balance.

This philosopher was further involved in the idea of evolution and at odds with the Jewish / Christian theology about the creation of the world(s).  This creation, his view, was a process of evolution in which all men were derived from the fish of the sea.  His basis for this idea was that man's long period as an infant of his species could not have survived in his original status, as he can at this time.  This philosopher is said to have been addicted to a kind of scientific curiosity which led him to assume that the sun was many times larger than the earth, and led him also, as is said, to be the first man to draw a map.  He was in his approach to originality always rationalistic as well as scientific.

This last of the "three' in the Milesian School was Anaximenes.  He was best known probably prior to the destruction of the city of Melitas by the Persians in 464 BC.  In his view the fundamental material was air.  In using this theory which showing differences between the quantitative element of the substances involved he depends completely on the element of condensation saying thus:

"The soul is air, fire being rarefied air, and when condensed air becomes first water, then earth and finally stone.

Anaximenes is thought to have greatly influenced Pythagoras, and the Milesian School is valuable in the ancient history of philosophy for the attempts made in the scientific realm.  The questions put forward were realistic, and the work of the Milesian School seemed to be little influenced by the Olympic Religion which was popular at the time.

__________

*--Burnet, "Early Greek Philosophy" Page 51, questions this last saying;

References:--

--Bertrand Russell, "A History Of Western Philosophy," A Clarion Book, Simon and Schuster , Pub., New York, 1967;
--Popkin and Stroll, "Philosophy Made Simple -- 2nd Ed., Revised," A Made Simple Book , Doubleday Pub., New York, 1993 (ISBN 0-345-42533-3)

<TOP>

Life After Death
Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens

Ladies and Gentlemen;

The question of life after death in the Roman world was in the early years apparently limited to the thought which was widely held that ancestors existed as ghosts usually within the tomb areas where they were buried.  Those who died, it was also thought, went to a place called the Underworld there to dwell for eternity.  It was also believed that the spirits (shade of the ancestors also could exert some kind of influence on the living in some unknown way.

in the area of the 3rd century the practice of burial of human remains seemed to become more popular than the previous method of cremation  The reasons for this change remain unclear, but one reason may well have been the rise of the belief that there was a possibility of a hope and expectation of some kind of life after death.  These hopes may have been brought into existence by the religions called the Oriental cults and NeoPlatonism.  Christianity had little or no part in this rise of these hopes, at this time, as it had not yet risen to prominence.  As an alternate reason it may simply be that it became more fashionable to consider more pomp and detail in the funeral sites and rites than previously thought appropriate

It does not appear that any specific religious view was accepted by the Roman populace about the life after death idea, however, there seemed to be the general belief that those who had died and who were not accepted into the Underworld by the Gods in command there, had nowhere else to go but to wander the world above for all time.  This could cause concern because of the possibility that the shade's failure to gain access to the underworld would place the blame on the living household from which it had come, or to others of intimate acquaintance.  To this end it appears that weights were in some cases added to the grave-site to keep the spirit in it's place, and on other occasion, heads were removed from the body to prevent this believed roaming and possible conflict.

At the death of a family member or loved one the , the mourning period (which was in the area of nine days) was filled with mourners and food and drink offerings) after this period the dead were remembered both in homes at the personal altars and at certain festivals particularly the festivals of Parentalia and Lemuria.

Parentalia was the festival of the dead at Rome, from 13 to 21 February.  The last day was for public ceremony, , but the preceding days were for the private commemoration of the dead. During this festival temples were closed, marriages forbidden, and magistrates did not wear their insignia of office.

The Feralia was the public festival of the dead held on the last day of Parentalia, when food was carried to the tombs for the use of the dead.

Following this day was the 22nd of February, a somewhat related festival of Cristia or Cara Cognatio (Dear Relation).  This was a day to renew family ties, patch up quarrels, and have a family meal during or after which an offering was made to the family "lares."

The "Lemures" or "larvae" were considered to be the members of the household who were fully expected to haunt the house of their previous life during the days of 9, 11, and 13 May. which were the festival days of Lemuria.  These ghosts were other than the spirits who were celebrated in the Parentalia festival, and might be considered to be hostile or approving, probably determined by the conditions of the individual and the household during the period in which the individual spirit had been alive.  The worst and most potentially terrifying of these spirits were thought to be the ones who died at a young age.  It was thought that they held a grudge against those who were still alive or those who had lived a long life.  The following is a ritual which was apparently followed by each householder;

He arose at midnight, on the 9th of May and made the "mano fica" sign (the thumb between the middle of the closed fingers -- a fertility charm) and then walked barefoot through the house.  As he went he spat out nine black beans, or else having washed his hands first, cast the black beans over his shoulder.  These were for the ghosts to eat as ransom for the living members of the household whom the ghosts would otherwise carry off.  This ritual was also both accompanied and followed by certain other rites believed to drive away ghosts.  These concerns must have generated some element of fear in those of the household were hoping for the shades acceptance of this offering!!!!

On the 11th of May offerings were made to Mania( the mother of the lares).  Mania seems to have been regarded as the goddess of death, and so a sacrifice to her during the Lemuria festival was likely.

All of these rituals and beliefs were the result of the general attitudes toward death and the life after death in the Roman world.  As the Oriental religions and NeoPlatonism began to affect the Roman culture the hope and expectation of the possibility of life after death became brighter.  Much of the early Oriental Religions was "borrowed" by the Christian religion and put forth as it's own.  There is still much dispute, even today, about who borrowed what from who.

In retrospect and consideration of the above, it must be considered that since much of the attention and a significant amount of time and effort on the part of the average Roman was devoted to the dead, those beliefs were strongly held and as such may have been a significant difference between the way they looked at life and the way in which we do.  Just as those who have indicated the need to learn Latin in order to arrive at some semblance of the real ancient Roman view of the world, each of these investigations into the more detailed culture in which we are currently involved also will have a great deal to do with the ideas and culture of the ancient Roman citizen.

<TOP>

Transportation in the Roman World
Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens

In writing about the subject Roman Roads loom among the largest of the basic topics.  The Engineering of these roads, the design, selection of materials and the subsequent building techniques are of significant interest to those studying the commerce of ancient Rome. 

The Romans as those civilization before them were well aware that their world could not be held together without a dependable and variety of transportation routes for military uses as well as the commerce of the world in which they lived.

The Romans gained much in this aspect from the Persians, and being the logical people that they were, they used this knowledge to construct a road network, so vast and so well built that many of today's roads in Europe are still based upon the construction of these excellent roadways.

These roadways not only provided for quick movement of troops and equipment, the materials of commerce, and the routes for travelers to all points of the Roman Republic and later the empire, but they were also the means by which the ideas and devices of the foreign world were brought to Rome.  Not everyone in Rome were  enamored of this influx of new ideas, and vices from outside the Roman World.  Conservative Romans complained the Syria had polluted the Roman world with their vices, and another asked, "How was vice introduced to Rome if not by road?" 

Roman Roads raise many questions in regard to their construction such as what were they made of and how did the Romans make them so straight??

Rome , the city was largely the recipient of much of the produce brought in by the Roads.  Corn (actually wheat, maize not being known until found in the new world) was imported into the city in great quantities from the granaries of North Africa and Egypt.  Of course these shipments came across the "Roman Lake" as the Mediterranean was known, and so transportation by sea was also a valuable and necessary resource for the Roman World.  While the roads were marvels of construction for this period, the movement of bulk commerce by sea, and river, while slow and often tedious was much faster over long distances, and ships were in general better carriers than wagons as to speed, and capacity.  However, ships also had their own problems, as the hundreds of wreck remains around the perimeter of the Mediterranean attests.  Storms on this severe raised both by the hot winds from the deserts to the South, and the frigid winds from the mountain height to the North, can be a vicious tempest for the oar / sail powered stumpy merchant ships to survive.

In construction of the roads surveyors laid out the proposed roadway in as straight a course as was possible.  It is assumed that they raised towers to survey far ahead of what could be seen on the ground, although no proof of this has yet been found.    They prepared a deep bed with great care so as to not allow the road paving to sink and form depressions as these depressions gathered water which could and did seep into the base and erode the underpinnings of the roadway.  The roads were trench until solid ground was reached and the the cavity was filled with naturally rounded stones imbedded in non-friable earth such as clay.  Then the whole was covered with large paving stones of some durable rock such as basalt (silex), granite or porphyry.  These stones were massive in size and fitted together so closely that they provided a smooth surface.  This kind of road was called "via silice strata" (road paved with silex).  The well-known "Via Appia" was constructed in this way over it's whole 360 mile (581 km) length.

Shipping and traveling by sea in the ancient world by Roman merchantmen was usually around the perimeters of the Mediterranean.  They did not stray far from land, and so the sea routes of Roman merchants was for the most part done in somewhat roundabout routes.  The et out of the sight of land could be dangerous unless one knew how to navigate from the stars.  The Phoenician seafarers were said to have possessed such skills but they were closely held secrets.

Large cargoes could and were moved by ship, stone for construction, and the great volume of grain needed for the empire were staples of sea borne trade, to be delivered either to smaller craft at the mouth of navigable rivers, or to move overland by the Roman Road network.

__________
References:

--Spielvogel, J, "Western Civilization -- Vol. I (to 1715), West Pub., 1991, (ISBN 0-314-82893-1;
--Lionel Casson, "Transportation;"-"Civilization In The Ancient Mediterranean -- Greece and Rome - Vol. III," M. Grant, and R. Kitzinger, Eds., Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1988;
--D. E. Johnson, "An Illustrated History of Roman Roads In Britain," Spurbooks Ltd., Buckinghamshire, U.K., 1979 (ISBN 0-906978-34-6)

 

<TOP>

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus
Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens

Roman Emperor, born in Rome on the 20 of April, 121AD, and died in Vindabona (now Vienna, Austria) March 17, 180AD.  His original name was Marcus Annis Verus, and was often referred to simply as Marcus Aurelius.  Marcus was descended from Roman ancestors who lived in Spain and this attracted the attention of Emperor Hadrian who had been been born in that province (Spain).  The Emperor Hadrian was pleased to appoint Marcus to the priesthood, and took upon himself the supervision of his education.  Among his teachers during his period of education was the eminent Marcus Cornelius Fronto one of the ablest teachers of his time.

Marcus began the study of philosophy and fro 147AD to 161AD he devoted himself deeply to this pursuit, and eventually became one of the most distinguished Stoic philosophers.  During this period he began work on his famous "Meditations" which reveal his thoughts in regard to how he believed life should be lived, and what the meaning of life meant for him.  With this background Aurelius began his reign as emperor very much as the philosopher-king that Plato had so desperately wanted nearly five centuries earlier in the Roman world.

In the area of Foreign affairs the Emperor was kept very busy first in a war with Parthia which ended in Roman victory and the ceding of Mesopotamia to become a Roman Province.  However, this victory was to cost the empire dearly in that the returning legions brought with them some kind of a disease which ravaged the Mediterranean Basin.  Immediately following the Parthian conflict, Aurelius turned to the Germanic hordes who had crossed the Rhinus River and were moving toward Northern Italy.  This task was also met with success and he further engaged the lands beyond the Danube (the Marcomanni, Quadi, and the Iazyges ere also conquered.  The Germans again descended beyond the Rhine and he was engaged with them until his death.

In his domestic policies Marcus Aurelius continued the good government of his predecessors.  Among these positive accomplishments were:

--foundation of schools for poor children;
--endowment of orphanages and hospitals;
--reform of taxation;
--abolition of cruelty in criminal laws;
--suppression of informers;
--diminution of absolute power by fathers over children and by masters over slaves;
--admission of mothers to equal rights to property left by their children;
--just government of provinces;
--adoption of the principle that merit governed advancement in public service;

However these above items of accomplishment must be compared to the les desirable elements of:

--increase in bureaucracy;
--decline of municipal initiative;
--depreciation of currency value;
--and the appointment of Commodus to the purple.

He is also known for his horrendous persecution of Christians whom he apparently hated.  He was devoted to the Roman Religio and his fear that the Christians would usurp that ancestral set of beliefs drove him to the fiercest persecution in Gaul where refined torture of these unfortunates resembled more of a barbaric chieftain that of a civilized sovereign.

_____
References:

--Sedgewick, Henry D. "Marcus Aurelius,"(New Haven, 1921);
--Farquarson Arthur S. "Marcus Aurelius, His Life and His World," (Oxford, 1951);
--Haywrd Frank H. "Marcus Aurelius, Savior of Men," (London, 1935)

<TOP>

Rhine River Patrol
Marcus Minucius-Tiberius Audens

Rhine River Patrol---

"What did you say??!!"  Marcus jerked his head around at this astounding news.  He dismounted quickly and ran to the woman's side.  The woman stood pointing toward the great tree standing beside the road and the heavy brush surrounding it.  There in the brush just off the road but still hidden from casual eyes was a man lying face down, with just a part of his foot and ankle visible.  The rawhide slipper had apparently fallen off his foot while he was trying to reach this place of concealment as another very similarly soiled and worn slipper was on the other foot just visible to the questing eye.

Marcus carefully stepped into the brush thicket, and pushing the stiff fronds to one side knelt beside the prone figure.  He reached down to touch the man's throat to ascertain if he was still alive, when the man started, and half-turned tugging at a long knife thrust into his belt.  With that beginning effort, he groaned, and then fell back senseless once again.

Marcus looked up at the woman, who stood in silence behind him with her hand covering her mouth, and a look of horror on her face.  "Well, he's alive, but not much more.  Help me get him up and out of this brush."

The woman stepped into the bushes on the other side of the fallen figure and knelt by him.  She gently brushed away the shaggy black hair from his eyes, and carefully tugged at his arm.  As his arm came free the man groaned again and the injured arm, now bleeding again, was exposed.  The woman hastily shifted her grip from the wounded limb to the man's shoulder and helped Marcus lift him to a sitting position.
"Put him on my horse commander ---- please," she said looking him in the eye with a distinct pleading in her voice.  The former attitude and animosity was gone now and her entire form and face pleaded for his agreement.  Again Marcus was caught off guard.  Her mood swings were more than he could understand, however, request and compliance was always better than an argument and he hastily nodded his head in agreement as they lifted the man to his feet and maneuvered him out of the thicket and into the open road.  Once there they lifted him onto the woman's horse not without hurting the man so severely that he groaned loudly twice more when the woman applied too much pressure on his wounds by accident..  Finally he was securely in the saddle slumped forward onto the neck of the horse still unconscious.  Marcus let the man's arms dangle on either side of the horse's neck to steady him better in the saddle.  The woman immediately tore long strips of cloth from the bottom of her ragged gown and Marcus tied the man's fee together to steady him and his hands together in front of the saddle.  The woman had retrieved one of the water bottles and was washing the man's wounded arm, The bleeding had stopped.

The man's clothes were little better than rags.  The mudpack that had been in placed over the inflamed wound had flaked away leaving a muddy ring tinged with black dried blood around the wound.

His appearance might suggest that he was a very poor itinerant worker or a slave.  If he was a slave why was he here in this condition and wearing a weapon?  If he was a worker he could have been set upon by thieves, but if so why ha they not taken the knife?  Marcus was thinking had about this when he felt a touch on his arm, he turned to see the woman standing before him. "Please help me to get this man to my room Sir!!"  There is was again.  Sir!!!!  Something he could expect from almost anyone except this woman.  What was happening here? 

"just what do you propose to do with him when he is in your room then," asked Marcus.  He did not smile but kept a straight face although he could imagine the answer to the question among his navy crew.

Looking Marcus in the eye, she said firmly but in a polite tone, "I propose to take him back with us and tend his wounds.  He needs help, he is hurt, and from his looks he is totally exhausted as well.  If you will not help me then I will endeavor to do something for him by myself."  Her determination was very evident in her voice.

To be continued

<TOP>


Email the Living History Engineer with questions!

Website last updated March 22, 2006

Email webmaster to report any broken links or problems